Partial segmentation describes how a central bank intervene and shape the exchange rate, and the gap between local versus overseas bond yields. By buying assets within the internal market and then selling them in the external market. These tactics of intervention are likely to yield an appreciation of domestic currency, reducing the spread between homes and abroad which, in turn yields a more stable exchange rate. These operations minimize dramatic variances in the actual exchange rate as well as preserving macroeconomic balance when it comes to account administration, trade changes, and external financing.
Central banks can attempt to combat the external forces of money by utilizing foreign exchange (FX) interventions. This strategy can, however, have negative outcomes by allowing those from outside of the country to benefit from the inter-rate gaps of interest at home and abroad. Moreover, the success of this intervention depends on the amount of capital available, and the size of the foreign exchange reserves, both of which may be restricted in smaller economies participating in foreign trade.
An optimal intervention policy for a small open economy should seek to balance costs of the FX interventions with the benefits of the exchange rate stabilization. To maximize the efficacy of such interventions while minimizing their costs, the central bank should target to optimize their intervention. The central bank should also maintain a high degree of capital control, to increase their ability to influence exchange rates and reduce the impact of external capital flows on the real rate of exchange. Further, it is paramount that the exchange rate regime is flexible and allows for appropriate and timely adjustments in response to changing economic conditions. Finally, the country should maintain healthy FX reserves to ensure adequate liquidity in times of market stress.
The trade-offs associated with alternative stable and competitive Real Exchange Rate (RER) policies are complicated. On the one hand, having a consistent exchange rate can lead to economic stability by minimizing the impact of external financing and terms of trade changes. On the other hand, a competitive exchange rate could stimulate economic growth through exported goods and services, allowing the nation to benefit from global commerce.
The relationship between these two objectives varies from country to country. It may depend on the capital mobility of the country, as well as on the size of its FX reserves. Policymakers must carefully evaluate the balance between macro-stability versus development when choosing an appropriate exchange rate policy.
Add comment
Comments